Things I Use: Electronic Aids

There is a lot of talk in the tech world about “wearables” — technology that can be worn on the body rather than carried separately, as a computer or phone is.  The buzz had a brief peak a few years ago with the distribution of Google Glass, a product that met with disappointment, mockery, and occasional rage.  Companies are still working on a device with a glasses-style form factor, while watches, especially the Apple Watch, have taken off as the most talked-about wearables.
 
But the wearable that is probably in most common usage — certainly the one I use most! — is a set of wearable headphones.  Last year I wrote about the LG Tone Infinim headphones, and I still use and enjoy those.  But the vast majority of the time you see me, I’ll be wearing the BeatsX by now-Apple-subsidiary Beats by Dre.
 
BeatsX Wireless In-Ear Headphones

I don’t really have a ton to say about these, so I’ll just put out some bullet points:
 
-When you have Dangerous Vision, headphones are a huge deal for two reasons.  First, if you can’t see well, it’s likely that some or all of the time you’re interacting with your phone you’ll be listening to it (Speak Screen, Voice Dream Reader, podcasts, music, etc.).  And if you do it aloud you’ll drive everyone around you insane.  So you’ll want headphones, and you won’t want to have to take them out of your pocket or purse 100 times a day; you need headphones you can wear.  That means wireless Bluetooth headphones, since headphones wired to your iPhone and also around your neck would be super-awkward; you’d be tied to your phone literally, rather than merely figuratively as so many of us are!
 
The second reason headphones are an essential wearable is that they offer a place to put physical buttons.  Steve Jobs was famously obsessed with ridding the iPhone of its buttons.  Since he built pretty much the greatest single product in the history of mankind and I didn’t, I won’t nitpick!  But having a sheet of smooth glass with no buttons on it is not ideal for the blind.  Jobs didn’t love buttons on headphones either, but he did allow a few!  Plus you can buy from other, more button-friendly, manufacturers and use them with an iPhone.  Upshot is, working with headphones gives you the tactile control that, if you’re at all like me, you want so badly.
 
-I’ve heard wonderful things about the Apple AirPods and will probably try them sometime soon.  The AirPods are a pair of buds that go in your ears and connect to your phone through Bluetooth.  By all accounts they work wonderfully well.  My instinct is that since they are two small objects not connected to one another, I’d be likely to lose one very quickly — it’s easy to lose things when you can’t see!  And that has kept me from purchasing them.
 
-The BeatsX is basically two AirPods on a string.  If one falls out of my ear, no problem since it’s connected to the other and draped over the back of my neck (if I’m wearing a shirt with a collar the wire snakes under the collar).  So the set won’t fall to the ground, and even if it did, it would be easy to find by feel as it’s effectively a one-dimensional object rather than approximately zero-dimensional like an AirPod (if you see what I mean!).
 
-It has the same great Apple design and build quality, and has perhaps double the battery life of the AirPods.  Plus you can plug it straight into the Lightning charger, whereas with AirPods you have to carry a charging case.
 
-The other big advantage compared to pods is that the BeatsX has a traditional Apple three-button controller.  that means you can not only connect/drop calls, Play/Pause and change volume but also rewind and fast forward just by clicking the tactile button on the wire.  I haven’t used the AirPods but my impression is you get better control with the BeatsX as they have three buttons instead of one.
 
-The microphone is fantastic; I left myself voice mail with the BeatsX on and the phone in my pocket, and it came through just as clear as if I held the phone to my face.
 
-Comparing to the LG, the BeatsX has these advantages:
 
-Considerably more comfortable to wear as the connecting wire is soft and flexible rather than hard plastic as with the LG (though the LG is pretty darn comfortable as well!).  I should mention here that the LG is just bigger; this, combined with the flexible cord on the BeatsX, means that when not around your neck there is a big convenience edge to the Beats.  They can just slip into a jeans pocket, while the LG would not fit and would probably break if you forced them in.
 
-Much better microphone
 
-More discreet design if you’re wearing a t-shirt
 
-Longer-distance Bluetooth; i.e. you can get farther from your phone and they still work
 
-They seem as though they are probably pretty water resistant, though I haven’t tested this and am not sure what Beats claims in this regard.
 
-BeatsX seems to me to have better ear seal and sound quality but check with others on that as, while I love music, I listen mostly to voice and I am not an audiophile-type sound-quality expert.
 
Advantages of the LG include:
 
-Controls are much easier to use.  Actually for volume the BeatsX is as good or better.  But the LG has a toggle for on-off which is vastly superior to the hard-to-use button on the BeatsX.  And the LG uses a very well designed rocker for REW and FF which works great for jumping ahead and back in books and podcasts.  Whereas the BeatsX requires you to triple-click the center key once for every step you want to take.  So if you’re going back three minutes in a book with Voice Dream Reader set to 15 seconds as mine is, that’s 12 pushes on the rocker of the LG, but 12 triple-clicks on the BeatsX, some of which will almost surely accidentally register as single-click (pause) or double-click (jump forward).  So going back more than a minute with the BeatsX is a bit of a pain.  More broadly, the LG is just much easier to control because it has so many more buttons.  It has two press-buttons, two rockers, and one toggle on-off switch; since a rocker can rock two ways that’s essentially seven buttons, vs. the three on the BeatsX.
 
-The increased number of buttons is partly a design choice, partly a result of the LG being physically larger so it has more room for them.  Another consequence of being bigger is that the LG has much more battery life.  Officially I think the LG has 16 hours to 8 for the BeatsX.  But that doesn’t really do the difference justice.  What it feels like is that the LG has 16 hours of actual use, while the BeatsX has 8 hours of being connected.  That probably isn’t quite right either, but, again just by feel, I’m not doing experiments here, what it seems like is if a typical day involves 3 hours of listening and 12-24 hours being turned on and Bluetooth connected to my phone, then the BeatsX lasts one day or less and the LG lasts 5 days or more.  It’s an enormous difference.  The BeatsX does offer two nontrivial forms of compensation, though.  First, they charge through a Lightning port, not microUSB as the LG uses.  So that may reduce by one the number of cords you need to carry.  And second, the BeatsX have an ultra-amazing fast-charge feature.  If you plug them in to the Lightning for 5 minutes, they charge to 25%, i.e. 2 hours.  This I have tested, and it really works!  Of course fully charging them takes far, far longer, probably an hour or two.  But 5 minutes buying you two hours is really sweet and definitely helps ease the pain of having to charge more often.
 
-The LG as mentioned is less discreet, indeed is goofy looking, over a t-shirt.  But because of its retractable buds it is pretty slick with a men’s collared dress shirt.  BeatsX are OK with such a shirt but not as good as LG.
 
-The LG costs a lot less, maybe $89 or so vs. $159 or thereabouts.  Since reading is central to my life and this is how I do it, I’m willing to pay up in this sort of range for what works best for me, but I wanted to mention this as $70 or so of difference is not nothing!
 
Upshot is, the LG is great, the BeatsX are great, and the AirPods are probably great.  Each have their uses.  If I could only have one I’d go with the BeatsX, but i’m glad I have both, and as I say I bet I’ll end up buying and trying some kind of Pod-like design in the next year or so.  If that happens, I will report back

Dumb Phone
I carry two phones.  As the iPhone gets better and better I may eventually be able to give this up, but I’m not there yet.  The purpose of the second phone is to enable me to dial and text entirely by feel, without needing to see a screen.  I am facile with the ancient art of T9 texting — ask your grandparents about it!

Upshot is I need a phone with big, easy to feel keys, a bright screen with black background as either default or at least as a choice, and large onscreen characters.  There aren’t a lot of choices, but I found one: the Doro PhoneEasy 612 from Sweden.  It’s my primary phone — the iPhone is my minicomputer, book reader, music player, toy, emergency backup phone, international phone, and several other things beside.  It’s indispensable.  But the Doro is fantastic as a phone and text machine, and I use it a hundred times a day for those purposes.

External Batteries
With as much electronic gear as I am carrying, not running out of power becomes an important concern.  But not being able to see makes finding power outlets a little more challenging when on the road or out for a long day of meetings or conferencing.  Of course if I ask to plug in at the start of a meeting, my hosts will oblige, but it can be awkward.  So I typically carry one or more external batteries with me.  Here’s what I use nowadays.

Skiva PowerVault 5000mAh Battery Pack

Picture

This is a beautifully-designed device.  First, it holds 500 mAh of power, which is a lot.  It fills my giant iPhone 7 Plus more than once, and fills normal devices like my headphones or my Sansa Clip Zip many, many times.

Second, it has both an Apple Lightning connector and also a micro-USB, the power charger for Android and pretty much all other non-Apple devices. So you can charge virtually any mobile device from the Skiva.  And the wires for the outputs fold neatly away, so the device won’t get tangled with other equipment.  To power it up, plug it into a micro-USB charger that’s plugged into the wall.  But if you go for a 2-day 1-night trip, and everything you bring is fully charged, including the Skiva, I’d say there is little chance you’ll  need to plug into a wall before you get home — the Skiva should hold enough juice to see you through.  It’s as compact as one can hope for something that holds what it does — about the size of a pack of cigarettes.

Skiva PowerVault A2600 iPhone Battery Pack

Picture

It only has half the power of the 5000, but it has two notable advantages.  First, it’s significantly smaller and has a cylindrical shape the the company accurately describes as being more “pocket friendly.”  Second, it has a very clever design with a built-in USB male connector.  That means you can plug it right into the back of any computer and charge up — with no additional cables of any kind.  If you use something like the 5000, and you want to be able to charge at a computer, you need to carry a USB-to-micro-USB cable, the 2600 eliminates that need.  But do be aware that with either the 2600 or the 5000, you’ll need a “wall wart” plug that goes into the wall and has a female USB output.  As a side note, the wall wart that comes with the iPhone charges at half-speed, for a modest price you can buy the iPad version that charges your phone (or pad) twice as fast.  I’m not a tech expert, so don’t sue me if this causes you problems.  I can only say that a) I’ve never had problems from the fast charging and b) the experts I trust say this is safe to do.

Charging Case
When people see that I carry my iPhone with no case, they think I am crazy to put this valuable and essential device at risk.  But I carry so much stuff around that I treasure the phone’s lack of bulk.  That said, if I could find a case that protected my phone and also obviated my need to carry an external battery, that would be worth it.  Recently I purchased such a device:

Alpatronix BX170plus iPhone 7 Plus Battery Case

Picture

I would say that for my needs it is good but not great.  It does exactly what it’s supposed to do, which is to protect the phone while carrying 4000 mAh of spare charge (about one fill-up for the 7+).
One problem is, if I want to charge my non-iPhone devices, I still need a spare battery, so the Alpatronix doesn’t completely solve my battery issues.  Still, for people who keep their phone in a case at all times, it’d be great.  But I want to take my phone in and out of the case several times a day.  And doing so with the Alpatronix requires peeling off the rubberized “bumper” that surrounds the phone, and then replacing it, and it’s a bit of a pain.
Why do I want to take the phone in and out?  Well, sometimes I want to charge up the case while carrying my phone.  That requires separating the two of them.  Sometimes I’m in a t-shirt and gym shorts and I want to cary the phone in a small pocket and so I don’t want the added bulk of the case.  Upshot is, I’d like a case that’s easy to add and remove.  Years ago I had such a case, by Mophie.  If my web searches are not failing me, Mophie is planning to introduce something like this for the 7 Plus but has not yet put it on the market.  They are also working on a modular system that sounds interesting — I think the idea is that I can charge the battery while leaving the case on the phone, and then attach the battery to the case by sticking it to the back with a magnet.  Magnets… is there anything they can’t do?!  Anyway, we’ll see about all that.  For now I’m semi-happy with my Alpatronix